Skip to main content

Monitoring and Evaluation

APHL leads monitoring and evaluation studies and provides expertise in mixed-methods evaluation to assess program effectiveness, impact, and efficiency, identifying successful outcomes, lessons learned, and opportunities for improvement. The program also designs studies, conducts statistical analyses and produces trending dashboards.

Questions?

Contact the Quality Systems and Analytics team: [email protected]

PERFORMACE ASSESSMENT

About Monitoring and Evaluation

Monitoring and evaluation systematically assess the performance of projects and initiatives. When done effectively, it reveals gaps or issues early and helps ensure resources are used efficiently. 

  • Monitoring is a continuous collection of specific data and information to track a project's progress and achievements, improve practices, and have internal and external accountability for the resources used.
  • Evaluation is the systematic and objective assessment of an ongoing or completed initiative using collected data and information. The aim is to determine the relevance and fulfillment of objectives, development efficiency, effectiveness, impact, and sustainability.
What APHL Does

Monitoring and Evaluation at APHL

Our Process

Our Monitoring and Evaluation efforts support programs and projects across the organization—domestically and internationally—and encompass five key areas:

  • Planning and Design: This stage involves extensive planning and designing of evaluation processes, such as creating evaluation questions, designing data collection methods, and developing plans for disseminating and reporting impact.
  • Reporting: To ensure organized and appropriate reporting, we create reporting systems and refine indicators and performance measures in collaboration with funders and partners.
  • Data Collection and Analysis: Data about the project/program is collected through a variety of evaluation instruments—such as observations, surveys, qualitative interviews and focus groups—depending on what is suitable for the subject.
  • Communicating Results: We prioritize using evaluation results effectively by converting data collection and analyses into actionable findings. In addition to reports or dashboards, results and outcomes are presented directly to the program/project managers, highlighting next steps and action items.
  • Continuous Quality Improvement: We work across the association to ensure the use of evaluation results, quality standards and best practices. This includes beta-testing, data-driven decision-making and quality control checks.

Our Reports

APHL-CDC Cooperative Agreement

In partnership with the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), APHL is supported via a five-year cooperative agreement to enhance public health laboratory capabilities and increase capacity. This agreement covers a wide array of member activities across many APHL programs, including training and leadership, experiential learning, environmental health, food safety, infectious diseases, preparedness and response, newborn screening, informatics, quality and safety and policy. The midpoint report, below, highlights some of the success stories from this critical work. View additional evaluation briefs and highlights on the CDC DLS site.

APHL-CDC Cooperative Agreement OE20-2001 midpoint report; highlights accomplishments from July 2020 – December 2022 that support the work of enhancing public health laboratory capabilities and increasing capacity.
APHL

Impact Stories

This report systematically assesses the Global Laboratory Leadership Programme’s (GLLP) impact in Ukraine through structured interviews with various members of the GLLP and reviews of the work plan, annual progress documents and workshop evaluations.
Global Health
Learn how the Uganda Public Health Fellowship Program—Laboratory Leadership Program is driving transformative change in Uganda’s health system.
Global Health, Quality Systems and Analytics, Workforce Development